Thread:Danielroxheaps/@comment-2126841-20180324192658/@comment-2763-20190104123411

OK, Daniel, I've had a closer look at both wikis. Yours has produced between two and three articles in the average month of its existence, twice what the other one has done. Your front page is much more appealing. Good work!

However, you have very little structure: you have created only three categories and not given a single one of them a parent category. The other wiki has also created three uncategorised categories but has dozens of categorised ones. Of your 44 articles, 25 are uncategorised - remarkably the same number as the other wiki but it has over a hundred categorised whereas you have only 19. Your input templates and preloads need a bit more work to be really foolproof so that pages will list sensibly without fiddly individual attention. You may have noticed my comments on your categories, mentioning such issues. The other wiki has three times as many templates as yours and seems to have better ways of standardising articles, though I haven't checked all the details. Have a look at https://shortland.wikia.com/wiki/Template:Infobox_character to see whether you agree that it is probably more advanced than yours. Then see its "What links here" page and look at the Chris Warner article - better than your character articles?

So in terms of numbers of pages to be moved or deleted/merged, the superficially better option would clearly be for yours to go into the other wiki. Staff could probably change the URL to your better one easily enough. (But it would soon change again to shortlandstreet.fandom. com or they might change straight to that.)